SSOGEN / Okta for AI Agents vs SSOGEN: What Each Product Documents
Compare
Okta for AI Agents vs SSOGEN: What Each Product Documents
Okta for AI agents vs SSOGEN is a choice between two ways to give an agent a registered identity, access limits and an audit trail. This page sets out what each vendor documents, including Okta's Cross App Access, and when each fits.
Okta for AI agents vs SSOGEN is one problem seen from two products. An AI agent must be a managed identity with an owner, limited access and a record of what it did, never a shared key. Okta’s product page says “Bring every agent into your identity security fabric to discover, onboard, and protect them at scale.” (Okta for AI Agents, read 2026-10-09).
SSOGEN gives every agent an owned identity, explicit grants, person consent, approvals, an audit trail and a way to stop agents at once. The same product signs in your employees, and its MCP Gateway checks each tool call inside your own network.
Everything about Okta below comes from Okta’s own pages, each cited with the date we read it. Okta changes its documentation often. Check the links first.
What Okta documents
Okta’s product page has four headings and names two products, Agent Gateway and Agent Single Sign-On.
- Find and register. The heading is “Find & register your agents”.
- Govern. “Govern agents across their lifecycle” mentions automated certification campaigns.
- Control at runtime. “Control agent access at runtime”.
- Stop. “Stop rogue agents in their tracks”.
- Kill switch. “Enforce a kill switch to rapidly revoke access, with a full audit trail for compliance”.
- Step-up approval. “High-risk actions require step-up human approval before execution”.
- XAA. Okta’s Cross App Access: “Okta’s open XAA protocol is standardizing secure, identity-governed agent connections.” More on Cross App Access below.
- Disclaimer. The same page says features may not be delivered or obtained on time or at all. Confirm with Okta what is available to you (Okta product page, read 2026-10-09).
For registration, Okta’s help page Add AI agents manually (read 2026-10-09) sets out these rules:
- Four methods. CIMD, client ID only, a client secret, and a public/private key.
- One active. You can stage several methods but activate only one at a time.
- Owners. An agent can have up to five individual owners, or one group of at least two members. Okta recommends at least two owners.
- Activation. You must activate the agent explicitly.
On the runtime side, Okta’s blog post Securing the agentic enterprise: The blueprint in practice (dated 2026-06-01, read 2026-10-09) says:
- MCP. The gateway “presents itself as an MCP server”.
- Grant. XAA uses the Identity Assertion Authorization Grant.
- Narrowed scopes. At each hop tokens are minted with narrowed scopes, so the final request carries “both the human context (the
subclaim) and the agent workload principal (theactclaim)”.
What SSOGEN documents
SSOGEN controls each AI agent from registration to shutdown.
- Identity. Each agent is registered with a name, a permanent identifier, a type, one to five human owners (people, never groups) and one primary owner. It is saved as Pending and can do nothing until an administrator activates it. If its last owner leaves, it is suspended.
- Keys, not passwords. The agent proves itself with a key pair. SSOGEN refuses any registration that contains a private key. Tokens are bound to the agent’s key through DPoP. They last about four minutes, 270 seconds at most.
- Two modes. An agent can act on its own or act for a person. Acting for a person needs the person’s consent, on a screen that shows the agent’s owner, the scopes and the duration. A delegation lasts 30 days at most, and the person can withdraw it.
- MCP. The MCP Gateway, a capability of the SSOGEN Gateway that runs in your network, sits in front of your MCP server and checks each tool call against the scopes granted. Scopes marked Sensitive need the person’s approval every time.
- Stopping agents. Suspend one agent, revoke one delegation, or flip a kill switch for a whole type. New tokens stop at once. Tokens already issued stop within five minutes.
- Audit. Every decision, allowed or refused, is recorded with the agent, the person, the scope and the tool name.
SSOGEN is also a complete identity provider, so the same product handles people’s sign-in. Details are on AI agent identity and in the MCP authorization guide.
Side-by-side table of what each publishes
Each cell restates a published statement. “Not stated” means the Okta pages we read did not say. It does not mean the vendor lacks it.
| Topic | Okta, per its pages (read 2026-10-09) | SSOGEN, per its documentation |
|---|---|---|
| Agent registration | Manual registration, plus import of agents built on Salesforce, AWS, Microsoft and ServiceNow into Universal Directory (blog) | An administrator registers every agent in AI Agents, then Identities; no agent registers itself through dynamic client registration or client ID metadata documents |
| Owners | Up to five individuals or one group of two or more; at least two recommended | One to five people, one primary; groups are not allowed |
| Agent credentials | CIMD, client ID only, client secret or public/private key; several can be staged, one active | Public key registered by the administrator; private keys refused; public MCP client with no keys acts only for a person |
| Token binding | Not stated on the pages read | DPoP-bound tokens required; Bearer refused |
| Acting for a person | XAA and token exchange carry the human (sub) and the agent (act) (blog) |
Consent screen, delegation up to 30 days, person can withdraw |
| Human approval | Human-in-the-loop approval for high-risk actions | Sensitive scopes need the person’s approval at each use, single use |
| MCP | Runtime Agent Gateway presents itself as an MCP server (blog) | MCP Gateway in front of your MCP server; scopes map to exact tool names; tools/list returns the full list and every tool call is checked by scope |
| Where the gateway runs | Not stated on the pages read | In your network, as part of the SSOGEN Gateway |
| Cross App Access (XAA) | An admin-managed protocol between a requesting app and a resource app, with the IdP issuing an ID-JAG token (see the section above) | An agent acting for a person uses the person’s own consent, given on a consent screen; administrators grant the apps and scopes |
| Kill switch | Kill switch to revoke access, with an audit trail | Per-type kill switch; refusals everywhere within five minutes |
| Discovery of unmanaged agents | Described on the product page under finding and registering agents | No unmanaged agent gets access: an agent can do nothing until an administrator registers and activates it |
| Legacy and on-premise apps | Access Gateway covers on-premises web apps and is a separate product (Okta Access Gateway docs, read 2026-10-09); not stated for agents on the pages read | MCP Gateway guide for Oracle E-Business Suite; Web Agent and App Proxy for existing applications |
Okta Cross App Access (XAA) and what SSOGEN documents
Cross App Access is Okta’s name for letting one app call another app’s API for a signed-in user, with the identity provider in the middle. All of this section comes from Okta’s own pages, read 2026-10-09.
What Okta says it is
Okta’s concepts page says “Cross App Access (XAA) provides a low-friction mechanism for an app to establish secure connections with a third-party resource server” and names the problem it targets: “Static API keys lack end-user context, and grant overly broad permissions. Direct app-to-app OAuth flows operate outside central identity governance” (Cross App Access (XAA)).
Okta names four parts:
- Requesting app. The app that needs access.
- Resource app. The app that holds the API.
- IdP. It issues an ID-JAG token.
- Resource authorization server. It checks the token and issues a short-lived, scoped access token.
Okta recommends OpenID Connect for new integrations. SAML 2.0 is supported for existing federations.
Okta says XAA “provides centralized governance, unified policy enforcement, and audit logging for every XAA request” and “integrates directly with AI agent frameworks and server standards, such as the Model Context Protocol (MCP)”.
How an admin sets it up
Okta’s help page calls XAA “a protocol that simplifies how third-party apps share data, moving complex consent processes away from end users and into the Okta Admin Console”.
- Admin Console. Admins manage the connections between a requesting app and a resource app.
- Subscription. The org must be subscribed to the Single Sign-On product (Configure Cross App Access).
- Agents. Okta’s blog ties it to agents. XAA uses the Identity Assertion Authorization Grant, and both the human and the agent travel in the token (blog above).
What SSOGEN does for the same job
An agent acting for a person follows these steps:
- The agent starts at a consent screen.
- The person sees the agent’s owner, the scopes and the duration.
- The approval is a delegation of 30 days at most. The person or an administrator can end it.
- Administrators separately choose which apps and scopes each agent may reach.
For the delegated case, SSOGEN’s AI agent identity page lists OAuth token exchange (RFC 8693), explained in OAuth token exchange.
In SSOGEN, the person’s consent always stands. An administrator’s approval never replaces it for an agent acting for that person, so no agent works for someone who did not agree.
Reading the difference
They answer different questions.
- Okta’s XAA is about app-to-app connections an admin approves in advance, so end users are not asked to consent app by app. Okta documents this for agents that mostly call third-party SaaS apps that support XAA.
- SSOGEN’s delegation asks the person, then checks each call at the gateway. It is built for tools that sit in your own network behind an MCP server, where SSOGEN checks every call. The Okta pages we read do not say how XAA applies to such tools.
When Okta is the better fit
Okta for AI agents fits when these describe you, going by how Okta positions the product:
- Existing Okta. You already run Okta for workforce identity and want agents in the same directory and policies. Okta says agents are registered in Universal Directory with lifecycle and ownership tracking (blog, read 2026-10-09).
- Discovery. Finding agents you do not know about is the first problem. Okta lists finding and registering agents, and its blog describes importing agents built on Salesforce, AWS, Microsoft and ServiceNow (read 2026-10-09).
- XAA apps. Your agents work against apps that support Cross App Access, and you want admins to approve those app-to-app connections centrally. Okta calls XAA an open protocol. Check which of your requesting and resource apps support it.
- Existing governance. You want agent governance inside an existing Okta governance process. Confirm with Okta which features are available.
When SSOGEN fits
SSOGEN fits when these describe you:
- Tools in your network. The tools your agents call live in your own network, like an Oracle E-Business Suite behind an MCP server, and you want the checkpoint there too.
- Key-bound calls. You want every MCP call tied to a key the agent holds, with plain bearer tokens refused.
- One product. You need one product for people’s sign-in to ERP and web apps, and for agent identity.
- Tool approval. You want a person’s approval on specific tools, enforced on every call, with a record that names the tool.
- Consent. You want no agent acting for a person without that person’s own consent.
Limits on both sides
SSOGEN draws clear lines. It protects the MCP server you already run, such as one for Oracle E-Business Suite.
- Scope and tool name. It authorizes each call by scope and tool name and leaves tool arguments to that server.
- DPoP proofs. MCP clients connect with DPoP proofs, so every call is tied to the agent’s key.
- Okta pages. For Okta, we read product and help pages. They are not a full specification. Licensing, supported agent platforms and the like are for Okta to answer.
Questions people ask
Can Okta and SSOGEN be used together?
Yes. Both use standard OAuth and OpenID Connect mechanisms, and SSOGEN accepts Okta as a sign-in source for people (see Okta sign-in). You decide how to split agents between the two for your environment.
Does Okta support MCP?
Okta’s blog says its runtime Agent Gateway presents itself as an MCP server (read 2026-10-09). Okta’s XAA page also says XAA integrates with server standards such as the Model Context Protocol.
What is Okta Cross App Access?
Per Okta, it is a protocol in which an identity provider issues an ID-JAG token so a requesting app can get a short-lived scoped access token from a resource app, with connections managed by administrators in the Okta Admin Console rather than by end users consenting app by app (read 2026-10-09).
Is SSOGEN an Okta AI agents alternative?
Yes, for the agent-identity jobs in the table: tools in your own network and people’s sign-in, in one product. The two take different routes. Okta documents agent discovery, XAA and certification campaigns. SSOGEN uses administrator registration, the person’s consent and a check on every tool call.
Where to go next
- Agent identity. Read AI agent identity.
- MCP. Read MCP Gateway.
- Non-human identity. Read non-human identity.
- One token for two parties. Follow OAuth token exchange to see how an agent and a person travel in one token.
About this comparison. SSOGEN Corporation prepared this page from Okta, Inc.’s public documentation and web pages, last read on 2026-10-09.
We took care to be accurate, but products, plans and prices change, and we may have misread or missed something, so some statements may be wrong or out of date. This page is for general information only and comes without any warranty.
SSOGEN is not responsible for errors, omissions or decisions made from it. Check the vendor’s own pages and test the products yourself before you decide. If you see a mistake, tell us and we will correct it.
Okta, Okta for AI Agents, Agent Gateway, Agent Single Sign-On, Universal Directory, Cross App Access, XAA and Okta Access Gateway are trademarks of their respective owners. SSOGEN is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by them.